|
What�s shocking is: Pharmaceutical
companies spent an estimated $1.9 billion on TV advertising in
2005. Frosch and
his team studied a sample of 38 ads for prescription drugs that
were on television in June and July of 2004. From this they were
able to determine the common strategies.
Using a statistical analysis based on
the frequency an ad was aired, the researchers report that 82
percent of the ads made "factual claims," but much less provided
further information about illnesses such as causes (26 percent),
risk factors (26 percent) or prevalence (25 percent).
And what may be the most important part
of all this: 98
percent of ads made "emotional appeals," and 78 percent implied
that use of the medication would result in social approval.
Fifty-eight percent of the time, products were depicted as
medical breakthroughs.
According to the article, the drugs
advertised included Allegra (allergy), Ambien (insomnia), and
Cialis (impotence), among others.
An Average
American Watches
16 Hours Of Drug Ads Per Year!
According to the new study, only two
developed countries -- the United States and New Zealand --
allow drug companies as much open and almost unrestricted access
to the TV airwaves.
And chew on this:
the average American television viewer now spends 16 hours a year
watching prescription drug ads, "far exceeding the average time
spent with a primary care physician," Frosch's team said.
But drug advertising wasn�t always this
�wide-wild-west.�
Before 1997, any drug ad -- on the air or in print -- had to
include lengthy details about the drug. Those details are still
found today in magazine ads for prescription drugs.
But, in 1997, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration made it easier for the companies to advertise on
TV. "They could just make a major statement that captures the
primary risks and make adequate provisions to refer the
consumers to other sources for more detail," Frosch said.
"They refer to a concurrent print ad or a website or toll-free
number."
Of course, even if patients are wooed by an ad, they
can't get prescription drugs on their own. But, Frosch said,
it's not enough to rely on doctors to make the right decisions
about drugs that patients should take. |
|
"The ads are effective in moving
consumers to ask doctors for these prescriptions," he said. "And patients
sometimes get the prescriptions, even though it's not the
appropriate drug."
Frosch called on lawmakers to change
the rules to force drug companies to provide more information
about the medications they advertise. He also suggested that
customers be skeptical of drug claims.
In 2006, the American Medical
Association called for a temporary ban on advertising for newly
approved drugs.
So what�s the
bottom line on all this?
What�s amazing is that tricky marketers can create an
exhibit so good that people actually believe they have a fake
disease. What�s even more amazing is that it seems like, if what the new
research is showing is correct, that drug companies are
BOMBARDING the major television networks with similar
advertising techniques designed to make consumers run to their
doctors and demand what they just saw on the commercial.
With
sophisticated market research, advertising techniques and almost
unlimited funds� you have to wonder� do you really have a health
problem serious enough to require prescription medication� or�
are you just responding to the emotional appeal of an ad?
It�s something to think about when you realize ALL
drugs have side effects.
And don�t forget, if you ever have any questions or concerns
about your health, talk to us. Contact us with your questions.
We�re here to help, and don�t enjoy anything more than
participating in your life long good health.
Welcome New Patients!
The Doctors and Staff of Warren Chiropractic Center want to
welcome all of our new patients. We are fully
committed to your health and wellness.
Make This Your Healthiest Year
Ever!!! |
|